Bleeding
Democracy through thousand cuts.
India was a
unique experiment in Democracy launched on 26th January 1950. All
other countries that gained independence post WW2 and tried to install Democracy
as their operating system crashed in little time. Ghana, Venezuela, Egypt, and Pakistan
are glaring examples of their OS lasting only a decade.
Sustaining Democracy
is a constant tug-of-war between the State and the citizens. If the citizens slept
at their desks, they gradually metamorphose into subjects, and the State shall
become autocratic. India being a UNION OF STATES, the tug-of-war takes several
dimensions. In any federal government, the right to govern needs to be closely
calibrated. The relationship between states and the union and the ren
individual autonomy and state authority needs constant surveillance.
Transgression by any of the party a PUSH BACK to ensure that anarchy does not
creep in.
To usurp
power, the State tried to whittle down individuals' autonomy.
Bleed India
through Thousand Cuts was a doctrine made famous by Bhutto and pursued actively
by his successor, Zia-Ul-Haq. To further his doctrine of thousand cuts,
Pakistan launched a low-intensity war on India by stoking militancy and pushing
terror modules inside India.
Today, our Democracy
is being bled by thousand cuts.
India, till
recently, had been able to withstand the shenanigans of its rulers starting
immediately after the "D" day.
The first attempt was by the Father of our Democracy, i.e., Nehru himself,
vide the first Amendment passed in 1951, barely within 16 months of the declaration
of the republic. Then, Indira Gandhi all but destroyed our Democracy by
declaring an emergency in 1975. The 42nd Amendment of the Indian
constitution was an ugly attempt at weakening our Democracy and curtailing our Judiciary's
powers. Thankfully, it was undone immediately after Mrs Gandhi lost the elections,
vide 43rd Amendment.
The
judiciary that had surrendered to the might of Indira Gandhi's powerful
authority immediately got back its demeanour once the emergency was withdrawn.
The most
critical part of Democracy is DEMOS. People never felt enamoured with Indira
and or Sanjay during the emergency. On the contrary, they discarded the yoke of
Indira by ensuring her defeat in the election following the emergency.
While
earlier attacks on Democracy were overt, akin to frontal attacks, today, it is
a low-intensity war. Emergency was declared by Indira mischievously by taking
advantage of specific legal provisions. It is being executed covertly as a daily
exercise of small and deliberate cuts and snicks. Consequently, seeing lacerating
wounds has become the new normal and does not jar our sensibilities. The mass media,
expected to cast light on such a criminal assault on Democracy, has chosen to
keep its eyes wide shut. Fake news fed through propaganda machines, aka Godi
media and Social media, has held the leader’s popularity high.
The primary reason for winning the election in
2014 was the polarization of majoritarian votes. This polarisation was
engineered by creating a siege mentality among Hindus. A phoenix of Hindu Good
and Muslim bad was created to ensure block voting by Hindus. As a result, muscular
Hinduism became the month’s flavour, and the BJP won the election on the back
of this aggressive Hinduism.
After that slow
downslide of Indian Democracy began, nearly all the institutions surrendered to
the might of the State, i.e., Modi. The media started singing a laudatory tune
for apparent reasons, and the Judiciary, for not-so-obvious reasons, began
towing the Government's arguments.
In the post-2019
elections, the Government has dropped all pretensions of Democracy. So now,
there was no need for velvet on the steel knuckleduster.
The
juggernaut of the electoral majority became the summum bonum of governance. Steamrolling
became the single-pointed agenda of this Juggernaut, aka Government. The policy
instrument of achieving this subjugation was the most primitive and blunt instrument, the Police
Danda or the State's muscle power. The 5th August 2019 scrapping of Article
370 and the overpowering of the JK government was achieved by deputing a
massive contingent of armed forces, clamping a curfew, and locking up the
entire citizenry, i.e., 7.5 million people in their homes. The Amendment of
UAPA made it evident that the State desired a rampant use of Raw Power. It
exhibited little concern for Democracy and total commitment to an undisguised totalitarian
rule.
CAA+NRC, the
Elgar Parishad case, Riots in North East Delhi, labelling Farmers' agitation as
a Khalistani movement, and booking someone under NSA for a FB post are all the
same Jigsaw puzzle. The Pegasus project is only the most recent piece that has
been revealed. The picture that emerges as our Jigsaw puzzle takes shape is of
DOMINATION—surveillance and control over the masses. Pegasus is a panopticon, a
system where the Guard can keep an eye on you without your knowledge.
Individual privacy was accepted as a fundamental right by the Apex Court with a
9-0 majority. The State cares two hoots about such niceties expressed by SC. The
electoral majority has seemingly granted the State all rights to exorcise Democracy
from the nation's spirit.
Individual autonomy is the substratum of Democracy,
yet it has been rendered insignificant. It was severely compromised when Amulya Leone was
arrested for raising a slogan. When Munawwar Faruqi was arrested for jokes, he would
likely crack a hundred such instances.
These cuts
to Democracy are reflected in several international indices, calibrating
democracies worldwide.
Jigsaw's
picture is rapidly taking shape. Control through surveillance is the
predominant colour in this picture without any stain of Democracy.
Comments
Post a Comment